
Visited the school in the afternoon after reaching from Bhubaneshwar and could spend about 1.5 hours only. Had a discussion with the HM and found that he had attended the first phase of training and had missed out on the second phase because of an accident. I am not very sure how well he understands the DE program as I didn't have much time to delve deeper into this aspect due to insufficient time at my disposal.
I could observe a lab transaction and the details are mentioned below.
Teacher name:Swarna Prabhakar
HM: Bidyadhara Panda
[X] Topic/ Lab Transaction: Soil
[X] Tools used: charts, computers, black board, Edu-kit
· Topic introduced indirectly
· Students used Edukit to explain
· Activity/Demonstration/box constructed of card board with one side covered with a transparent paper used to demonstrate the different the different layers of soil
· Students given an opportunity to demonstrate
· Questions posed to students as well as the class - question wheel used, which was an innovative arrangement
· Group formation and activity
· Evaluation sheet was used
· Lesson plan available
· Micro-lesson planning not available
· Home task was assigned to all the students/groups
· Quick assessment showed that students have understood the fundamentals and were forthcoming with answers to all the questions posed
· Teacher aware of Edukit but not very thorough
· Had a look at the registers - training (teacher and students), lab transaction and pedagogy and found them to be up to date.
· 3 resource group meetings have been held so far instead of 5 (@ of 1 per month)
· There are 6 teachers who are undergoing training but three of them seem to use computers regularly whereas the other three are aged people and are not very enthusiastic about computers and I found them doing lesson plans in paper.
[ ] I feel the school can improve in many ways and there are ample opportunities available for the same.
[X] Critical remarks
[X] Group formation was resorted to by the teacher but there was no clear role allocation.
[X] Using a question wheel to select questions for groups was a very innovative step.
[X] As far as an ideal lab transaction is concerned it met most of the criteria as detailed by the team in our earlier review-cum-refresher meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment